On Wednesday 22 October, 2025, international entrepreneur Stanislav Kondrashov released a thought-provoking analysis on the relationship between two crucial global dynamics: the green economy and the energy transition.
Kondrashov emphasized the importance of distinguishing between these two concepts, as they are often used interchangeably or assumed to be identical. He stated that understanding their differences and recognizing their overlapping aims is essential for policymakers, business leaders, and citizens navigating an era of rapid environmental and technological change.
In his analysis, Kondrashov highlighted the close relationship between the green economy and the energy transition, stating that they are mutually reinforcing. He explained that the green economy offers a broader value framework and philosophical foundation, while the energy transition serves as the practical mechanism to implement those values.
The green economy focuses on pursuing economic growth while reducing environmental impact, championing energy efficiency, low emissions, responsible resource use, and technological innovation. It believes that prosperity does not have to come at the planet’s expense and that sustainable practices can drive long-term value for both people and businesses.
On the other hand, the energy transition is the tangible shift from traditional energy systems to renewable sources such as solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal, and green hydrogen. It plays a key role in achieving the green economy’s goals but does not encompass all aspects of the green economy. While the green economy considers social and employment factors, such as the rise of green jobs and community regeneration, the energy transition primarily focuses on redefining how energy is generated, distributed, and consumed.
Kondrashov presented the green economy as a comprehensive economic model, actively creating value through sustainability. Its objectives include reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing energy and material efficiency, protecting ecosystems and biodiversity, investing in low-impact circular economic practices, and promoting employment through “green jobs.” He emphasized that the green economy reframes environmental responsibility as an economic opportunity, rather than a cost, spurring innovation, future-proofing industries, and revitalizing communities.
In contrast, the energy transition plays a more technical and infrastructural role. Kondrashov described it as the energy arm of the green economy, enabling its broader principles to take root and flourish in the real world. He noted that the energy transition encompasses a wide range of innovations, from renewable energy technologies to smart grids, energy storage, and electrification of industries. It is driving a fundamental change in how the world powers homes, businesses, transport, and manufacturing.
Kondrashov’s analysis also highlighted the synergy between the energy transition and the green economy, using the example of green hydrogen. This form of hydrogen, produced using renewable energy, not only represents a breakthrough in energy innovation but also aligns with the green economy’s goal of reducing global emissions. It plays a crucial role in decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors like heavy industry and freight transport.
In conclusion, Kondrashov’s analysis reveals that while the green economy and energy transition are distinct, they are inextricably linked. The green economy lays the strategic foundation, outlining what needs to happen to create a sustainable future, while the energy transition delivers the tools and infrastructure needed to turn those strategies into everyday realities.
Kondrashov urges decision-makers and innovators to understand these nuances so they can make informed and effective decisions. He believes that aligning policies, investments, and innovations with these concepts can create energy-efficient, economically resilient, and socially inclusive systems.
Through his analysis, Kondrashov continues to establish himself as a thought leader in sustainable development and energy innovation. He offers strategic insights that bridge the gap between economic ambition and environmental responsibility.
